“Latest shipment date; port of destination”正确的翻译为()。 A.最迟装运期;进境港 B.推迟装运期;到货
A.A.最迟装运期;进境港
B.B.推迟装运期;到货港
C.C.最迟装运期;到货港
D.D.推迟装运期;进境港
A.A.最迟装运期;进境港
B.B.推迟装运期;到货港
C.C.最迟装运期;到货港
D.D.推迟装运期;进境港
A.A. 20 June 2002
B.B. 25 June 2002
C.C. 15 June 2002
D.D. 24 June 2002
(1)( ) 29-01-2008.
(2)( ) 30-01-2008.
(3)( ) 31-01-2008.
(4)( ) Not applicable.
Which of the following is the shipment date under this L/C?
(1)( ) 10th to 20th January.
(2)( ) 11th to 19th January.
(3)( ) Anytime before 15th January.
(4)( ) 9th to 21st January.
A. An AWB indicates:
(1) A specific notation of an actual date of despatch is 10 July.
(2) A date of issue of the AWB is 11 July.
B. A credit stipulates air transport shipment latest 10 July, the above AWB is ( ) acceptable/( ) not acceptable.
C. A credit stipulates air transport shipment latest 10 July, it also calls for an actual date of dispatch to be indicated by a specific notation of such date, then the above AWB is ( ) acceptable/( ) not acceptable.
- Partial shipment allowed.
- Latest shipment date 30 April.
- Expiry date 15 May.
On 2 March the applicant requests an amendment prohibiting partial shipment and extending the expiry date to 30 May. In accordance with UCP 600 what MUST the issuing bank do?
(1)( ) Clarify with the applicant the period for presentation.
(2)( ) Issue the documentary credit as originally instructed.
(3)( ) Issue the documentary credit incorporating all the amendments.
(4)( ) Issue the documentary credit incorporating only the extended expiry date.
If a B/L on board dated 10 June, 200× while the inspection certificate dated 11 June, 200×, it is( ) acceptable/( ) unacceptable.
根据合同内容审核信用证,指出不符之处并提出修改意见
Packing: 1PC/POLYBAG, 500PCS/CTN Shipping Mark: L. P.
Time of Shipment: DURING JAN. 2009 BY SEA BARCELONA
NOS. 1-26
Loading Port and Destination: FROM QINGDAO TO BARCELONA
Partial Shipment and Transshipment: ALLOWED
Insurance: TO BE EFFECTED BY THE BUYER
Terms of Payment: THE BUYER SHALL OPEN THROUGH A BANK ACCEPTABLE TO THE SELLER AN IRREVOCABLE SIGHT LETTER OF CREDIT TO REACH THE SELLER 30 DAYS BEFORE THE MONTH OF SHIPMENT AND TO REMAIN VALID FOR NEGOTIATION IN CHINA UNTIL THE 15th DAY AFTER THE FORESAID TIME OF SHIPMENT
ISSUE OF DOCUMENTARY CREDIT
27 :SEQUENCE OF TOTAL: 1/1
40A: FORM. OF DOC. CREDIT : IRREVOCABLE
20: DOC. CREDIT NUMBER: 103CD137273
31C: DATE OF ISSUE: 081215
40E: APPLICABLE RULES :UCP LATEST VERSION
31D: DATE AND PLACE OF EXPIRY: DATE 090202 PLACE IN SPAIN
51D: APPLICANT BANK: BANCO SANTANDER, S. A. 28660 BOADILLA DEL BARCELONA, SPAIN
50: APPLICANT:LINSA PUBLICIDAD, S. A. VALENCIA, 195 BAJOS. 08011. BARCELONA, SPAIN
59: BENEFICIARY: SHANDONG YIHAN IMP. &EXP. CO. , LTD. No. 51 JINSHUI ROAD, QINGDAO, CHINA
32B: AMOUNT:CURRENCY EUR AMOUNT 19250.00
41A: AVAILABLE WITH...BY ANY BANK IN CHINA BY NEGOTIATION
42C: DRAFTS AT... 30 DAYS AFTER SIGHT
42A: DRAWEE: LINSA PUBLICIDAD, S. A.
43P: PARTIAL SHIPMTS: NOT ALLOWED
43T: TRANSSHIPMENT: NOT ALLOWED
44E: PORT OF LOADING: ANY CHINESE PORT
44F: PORT OF DISCHARGE: VALENCIA, SPAIN
44C: LATEST DATE OF SHIPMENT: 090115
45A: DESCRIPTION OF GOODS
GOODS AS PER S/C No. YH08036 DATED ON DEC. 1, 2008
CARDHOLDER DYED COW LEATHER
BLACK COLOUR/8000PCS AT USD1.45/PC FOB QINGDAO
BROWN COLOUR/5000PCS AT USD1.50/PC FOB QINGDAO
PACKING: 200PCS/CTN
46A: DOCUMENTS REQUIRED
1. SIGNED COMMERCIAL INVOICE IN 3 COPIES
2. CERTIFICATE OF ORIGIN GSP FORM. A ISSUED BY OFFICIAL AUTHORITIES
3. PACKING LIST IN 3 COPIES
4.FULL SET CLEAN ON BOARD BILLS OF LADING MADE OUT TO ORDER MARKED FREIGHT PREPAID AND NOTIFY APPLICANT
5.INSURANCE POLICY/CERTIFICATE IN DUPLICATE ENDORSED IN BLANK FOR 110% INVOICE VALUE COVERING ALL RISKS AND WAR RISK AS PER CIC
47A: ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
BILL OF LADING ONLY ACCEPTABLE IF ISSUED BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING SHIPPING COMPANIES: KUEHNE-NAGEL (BLUE ANCHOR LINE) VILTRANS (CHINA) INT'L FORWARDING LTD. OR VILTRANS SHIPPING (HK) CO., LTD.
71B: CHARGES: ALL CHARGES ARE TO BE BORN BY BENEFICIARY
48: PERIOD FOR PRESENTATION: WITHIN 5 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF SHIPMENT, BUT WITHIN THE VALIDITY OF THIS CREDIT
49: CONFIRMATION INSTRUCTION: WITHOUT
经审核该信用证需要修改的内容如下:
Complaints caused by not delivering according to the time and quantity
In the fall of 2006 ,one of our trading companies concluded a substantial rice business with an old customer in Africa. The terms of delivery are : shipment is to be made in equal monthly lots beginning from December,2006 to June,2007 and payment is to be made by irrevocable letter of credit 60 days after the date of the bill of lading. The customer established the L/C in time and all particulars of the rice, such as the name , specifications , unit price,total price and total quantity are in conformity with the contract. But the terms of shipment only stated " the latest date of shipment is June 30 ,to be shipped in several lots".
The staff in our trading company made the first shipment in December according to the quantity stated in the contract. However in order to export more and eam more foreign exchange earlier, they advanced the time of shipment regardless the shipment terms stipulated in the contract. In January 2007 , our company shipped the quantity of the first quarter once , and in February made the third shipment for the rest quantity that should be delivered in the second quarter, since our staff had not found any specifications "shipment is to be made in equal lots" in the L/C. At the same time our bank negotiated against presentation of the stipulated documents and subsequently asked the opening bank to pay for the goods. The opening bank examined the L/C and confirmed that the L/C had no error in it.
After receiving the shipping advice, the African customer found that the delivered quantity of the rice both in the second lot and third lot were not in accordance with the shipment terms stipulated in the contract, so a claim was filed by the customer against our trading company for default shipment. The amount claimed involved the added fees of chartering warehouse for the delivered goods, the interest and other charges etc. The two parties negotiated the compensation for several times, finally our company accepted the opposing party's opinion and agreed that the purchase price for the last two lots was to be paid four months later, that meant our company would receive the payment a few months later than che original stated time. According to Lhe current price in the international market at that time, our trading company suffered the loss equivalent to 10 percent of the original selling price.
Questions :
(1) What is the relationship between the letter of credit and the transaction contract?
(2) Which proof must the two parties concerned base on when they perform their obligations?
(Translate the case into Chinese and then answer the question)
Helpful hint: It is stipulated in Article 4 of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits that "in credit operations all parties concerned deal in documents and not in goods , service and/or other performance to which the documents may relate" .