题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
“________ paper do you read？”
“I read‘China Daily’.”
A.Which
B.How
C.How many
D.What
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
更多““________ paper do you read？”“…”相关的问题
It seemed that the dog knew well that the paper its master gave it ______.
A．might do it much harm
B．could do it much good
C．would give the butcher some meat
D．was worth many pounds
Way do agriculturalists think that hemp would be better for paper production than trees？
A．It is cheaper to grow hemp than to cut down trees.
B．More paper can be produced from the same area of land.
C．Hemp produces higher quality paper.
D．It is easier to find hemp than to find trees.
A.Go on a business trip with him
B.Help him with his research paper
C.Write a report for him
A.A teenage salesgirl was unable to do simple mental calculations
B.A class of 60 seniors at a private college were impossible to write a short paper without misspellings
C.Many students I see know nothing about world history or geography
D.A friend's lazy 26-year-old daughter who preferred to go to school
It is wise to write them down on paper because it is less easy to dismiss them that way.
For example, can you cut down on the amount of gas you use by taking public transportation？
If you eat out often, consider making more meals at home.
Examine your buying habits.
Of course，the best paper comes from wood.Wood comes from trees，and trees are plants.Vegetables and fruit and plants too，and we eat a lot of them.So can we also eat wood and paper？
Scientists say，"All food comes in some way from plants." Well，is that true？ Animals eat grass and grow fat.Then we eat their meat.Little fish eat little sea-plants; then bigger fish swim along and eat the...Chickens eat bits of grass and give us...Think for a minute.What food does not come from plants in some way？
Scientists can do wonderful things with plants.They can make food just like meat and cheese.And they can make it without the help of animals.It is very good food too.Now they have begun to say，"We make our paper from wood.We can also make food from wood.The next thing is not very difficult." What is the next thing？ Perhaps it is-food from paper.Scientists say，"We can turn paper into food.It will be good，cheap food too; cheaper than meat or fish or eggs."
So please keep your old books and letters.Don't feed them to your cat.) One day，soon，they will be on your plate.There is nothing like a good story for breakfast.
1、The best paper come from Wood.()
2、From the passage，we can infer 推断) thatfew kinds of food do not come from plants in some way.()
3、The main idea of the passage is all food comes from plants in some way.()
4、The writer asks us to keep our old books and letters because we can make food from them soon.()
5、The best title for the passage is " Food from Plants ".()
People【26】up the editor when something interesting【27】. The editor sends a reporter and a photographer to find out【28】.
The reporter phones the newspaper to tell the story. A typist types it【29】. Next, the editor decides how much "space" to give the story. Important stories【30】most of a page. The stories are keyed (输入) into a computer and【31】print.
The first copies are called "proofs (校样) ". Another editor【32】mistakes. The stories are all【33】in the paper. Then the paper is printed.
The newspapers are【34】by lorry, plane or rail.【35】are taken all over the country. The【36】arrive early in the morning, and people buy them.
Not all newspapers【37】every day. Some are weekly with a Sunday edition. Local (地方的) newspapers【38】the news for different parts of the country.
Working on a daily paper is always busy. But people working on weekly papers do not have to work【39】such a hurry. Sometimes reporters【40】all over the world to report news.
(46)
A．printed
B．print
C．is printing
D．are printed
Blaming the permissive 1960s is nothing new, but this is not yet another criticism against the decline in education. Mr. McWhorter's speciality is language history and change, and he sees the gradual disappearance of "whom", for example, to be natural and no more regrettable than the loss of the case-endings of Old English.
But the cult of the authentic and the personal, "doing our own thing", has spelt the death of formal speech, writing, poetry and music. While even the modestly educated sought an elevated tone when they put pen to paper before the 1960s, even the most well regarded writing since then has sought to capture spoken English on the page. Equally, in poetry, the highly personal, performative genre is the only form. that could claim real liveliness. In both oral and written English, talking is triumphing over speaking, spontaneity over craft.
Illustrated with an entertaining array of examples from both high and low culture, the trend that Mr. McWhorter documents is unmistakable. But it is less clear, to take the question of his subtitle, why we should, like, care. As a linguist, he acknowledges that all varieties of human language, including non-standard ones like Black English, can be powerfully expressive—there exists no language or dialect in the world that cannot convey complex ideas, He is not arguing, as many do, that we can no longer think straight because we do not talk proper.
Russians have a deep love for their own language and carry large chunks of memorized poetry in their heads, while Italian politicians tend to elaborate speech that would seem old-fashioned to most English-speakers. Mr. McWhorter acknowledges that formal language is not strictly necessary, and proposes no radical education reforms—he is really grieving over the loss of something beautiful more than useful. We now take our English "on paper plates instead of china". A shame, perhaps, but probably an inevitable one.
According to McWhorter, the decline of formal English ______.
A．is inevitable in radical education reforms
B．is but all too natural in language development
C．has caused the controversy over the counter-culture
D．brought about changes in public attitudes in the 1960s
Secondly, it is said that computers "only do what they are told", that they have to be programmed for every computation they undertake. But I do not believe that I was born with an innate ability to solve quadratic equations or to identify common members of the Britain flora: I, too, had to be programmed for these activities, but I happened to call my programmers by different names, such as "schoolteacher", "lecture" or "professor".
Lastly, we are told that computers, unlike human beings, cannot interpret their own results. But interpretation is always of one set of information in the light of another set of information: it consists simply of finding the joint pattern in two sets of data. The mathematics of doing this is cumbersome but well known; the computer would be perfectly willing to do the job if asked.
What is the author's attitude towards "the recurrent theme of the omniscient computer" which will ultimately take over the ordering of human life and affairs？
A．He supports it.
B．He shows his objection.
C．Not definitely expressed.
D．He shows ambivalence.
Part A
Directions: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. (40 points)
A few common misconceptions. Beauty is only skin-deep. One's physical assets and liabilities don't count all that much in a managerial career. A woman should always try to look her best.
Over the last 30 years, social scientists have conducted more than 1,000 studies of how we react to beautiful and not-so-beautiful people. The virtually unanimous conclusion: Looks do matter, more than most of us realize. The data suggest, for example, that physically attractive individuals are more likely to be treated well by their patents, sought out as friends, and pursued romantically. With the possible exception of women seeking managerial jobs, they are also more likely to be hired, paid well, and promoted.
The scientists' typical experiment works something like this. They give each member of a group—college students, perhaps, or teachers or corporate personnel managers a piece of paper relating an individual's accomplishments. Attached to the paper is a photograph. While the papers all say exactly the same thing the pictures are different. Some show a strikingly attractive person, some an average looking character, and some an unusually unattractive human being. Group members are asked to rate the individual on certain attributes, anything from personal warmth to the likelihood that he or she will be promoted.
Almost invariably, the better looking the person in the picture, the higher the person is rated. In the phrase, borrowed from Sappo, that the social scientists use to sum up the common perception, what is beautiful is good.
In business, however, good looks cut both ways for women, and deeper than for men. A Utah State University professor, who is an authority on the subject, explains: in terms of their careers, the impact of physical attractiveness on males is only modest. But its potential impact on females can be tremendous, making it easier, for example, for the more attractive to get jobs where they are in the public eye. On another note, though, there is enough literature now for us to conclude that attractive women who aspire to managerial positions do not get on as well as women who may be less attractive.
According to the passage, people often wrongly believe that in pursuing a career as a manager
A．a person's property or debts do not matter much.
B．a person's outward appearance is not a critical qualification.
C．women should always dress fashionably.
D．women should not only be attractive but also high-minded.
Over the last 30 years, social scientists have conducted more than 1,000 studies of how we react to beautiful and not-so-beautiful people. The virtually unanimous conclusion: Looks do matter, mom than most of us realize. The data suggest, for example, that physically attractive individuals are more likely to be treated well by their parents, sought out as friends, and pursued romantically. With the possible exception of women seeking managerial jobs, they are also more likely to be hired, paid well, and promoted.
Un-American, you say, unfair and extremely unbelievable？ Once again, the scientists have caught us mouthing pieces while acting just the contrary. Their typical experiment works something like this. They give each member of a group-college students, perhaps, or teachers or corporate personnel managers a piece of paper relating an individual's accomplishments. Attached to the paper is a photograph. While the papers all say exactly the same thing the pictures are different. Some show a strikingly attractive person, some an average looking character, and some an unusually unattractive human being. Group members are asked to rate the individual on certain attributes, anything from personal warmth to the likelihood that he or she will he promoted.
Almost invariably, the better looking the person in the picture, the higher the person is rated. In the phrase, borrowed from Sappo, that the social scientists use to sum up the common perception, what is beautiful is good.
In business, however, good looks cut both ways for women, and deeper than for men. A Utah State University professor, who is an authority on the subject, explains: in terms of their careers, the impact of physical attractiveness on males is only modest. But its potential impact on females can be tremendous, making it easier, for example, for the more attractive to get jobs where they are in the public eye. On another note, though, there is enough literature now for us to conclude that attractive women who aspire to managerial positions do not get on as well as women' who may be less attractive.
According to the passage, people often wrongly believe that in pursuing a career as a manager______.
A．a person's property or debts do not matter much
B．a person's outward appearance is not a critical qualification
C．women should always dress fashionably
D．women should not only he attractive but also high-minded
