题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
The local government leaders are making every effort to ______ the problem of poverty.
A．abolish
B．tackle
C．remove
D．encounter
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“The local government leaders a…”相关的问题
The High Street is so narrow that the local government has decided to ______ it.
A．increase
B．lengthen
C．widen
D．extend
All the essential services on which we depend are
A．run by the Government or our local authorities
B．in constant need of financial support
C．financed wholly by rates and taxes
D．unable to provide for the needs of the population
A．the local officials don't realize the importance of NREGA
B．the local government doesn't get enough support from the central government
C．the local poor people know little about NREGA
D．Bihar is the most lawless state in India
A．widened
B．constituted
C．displayed
D．outgrown
A．to borrow as much money as they wish
B．to make certain everybody saves money
C．to raise money to finance new development
D．to make certain everybody lends money to them
From the passage we will learn that the clean-up effort______.
A．is the largest one supported by Sherpas Nepal
B．is opposed by the local people
C．is encouraged by the American government
D．is the greatest one ever made in the world
决于这是国内战争还是世界大战？
What will happen to the trade balance and the real exchange rate of a small open economy when government purchases inerease, such as during a war？ Does your answer depend on whether this is a local war or a world war？
Compared with its neighbours' economies, Britain's has been doing very nicely in recent years. Only one big threat looms: the possibility of a bust in the overheated and volatile housing market, which could feed through to the rest of the economy and lead to recession, as happened in the early 1990s. The government reckons that one reason why house prices have been rising so fast, particularly in the south-east of England, is that, while real wages have been going up and foreigners pouring in, little new housing is being built.
Nimbyism helps explain the shortage of new housing in the south-east. People living in pretty villages don't want new estates on their doorstep. After all, they spent their hard-earned cash on a view of rolling acres, not of spanking new red-tiled roofs. Nimbys' hostility to development acquires legal force through the planning system, which has, in large part, been controlled by elected local authorities.
Although some big new developments—including the first new towns since the early 1970s—are getting the go-ahead, others are hard-fought. The government's solution is to undermine local planning powers. The new Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act, which starts to come into force next month, shifts power from elected county councils to unelected regional bodies, and gives statutory force to the government's estimates of the number of new houses needed in different bits of the country. That will make it harder for councils in overheated areas to turn down developers.
The government is right that the planning system is excessively biased against growth: existing property-owners, who control the system through local authorities, have little interest in sanctioning developments which may reduce the value of their houses. But the government was wrong to go about lowering the barriers to development by talking power away from local authorities, thus further centralizing Britain's already far-too-centralised political system.
According to the text, Downing Street No. 10 is in an awkward predicament of
A．real estate development.
B．gardening expansion.
C．hostility to scarcity.
D．economic recession.
(c) In October 2004, Volcan commenced the development of a site in a valley of ‘outstanding natural beauty’ on
which to build a retail ‘megastore’ and warehouse in late 2005. Local government planning permission for the
development, which was received in April 2005, requires that three 100-year-old trees within the valley be
preserved and the surrounding valley be restored in 2006. Additions to property, plant and equipment during
the year include $4·4 million for the estimated cost of site restoration. This estimate includes a provision of
$0·4 million for the relocation of the 100-year-old trees.
In March 2005 the trees were chopped down to make way for a car park. A fine of $20,000 per tree was paid
to the local government in May 2005. (7 marks)
Required:
For each of the above issues:
(i) comment on the matters that you should consider; and
(ii) state the audit evidence that you should expect to find,
in undertaking your review of the audit working papers and financial statements of Volcan for the year ended
31 March 2005.
NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three issues.
