题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
A)基本上没有人会忽略这一事实，拿平均工资的工人可能具备大师的技能。
B)没有人能否认这一基本事实：平均水平的工人要轻易地掌握这些技能是不容易的。
C)基本上没有人会忽略这一事实：干普通工作的工人是不可能轻易地掌握这些技能的。
D)基本上没有人会忽略这一事实：拿平均工资的工人不可能轻易掌握这些技能。
E)没有人能否认这一基本事实： 对一般工人而言，要想轻易地掌握这些技能是不可能的。
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“No one can deny the basic fact…”相关的问题
A.which
B.what
C.When
D.that
Consider medicine, for instance. No one can deny that medical progress has enriched our lives tremendously. Because of medical advances, we eat better, live easier and are able to take care of ourselves more efficiently. We can cure disease with no more than one injection or a pill. If we have a serious accident, surgeons can put us back together again. If we are born with something defective, they can repair it. They can make us happy, restore our normality, ease our pain, replace worn parts and give us children. They can even bring us back from the dead. These are wonderful achievements, but there is a price we have to pay.
Because medicine has reduced infant mortality and natural death so significantly, the population has been rising steadily, in spite of serious efforts to reduce the rate of population growth. Less than a century ago in the United Stales, infant mortality claimed more than half of the newborn within the first year of life. Medical advances, however, have now reduced that rate to nearly zero. A child born in the United States today has better than a 90% chance of survival. Furthermore, medical advances have ensured that most of these infants will live to be seventy years of age or more, and even that life expectancy increases every year. The result of this progress is an enormous population increase that threatens the quality of life, brought about by progress in the medical profession.
According to this passage, " progress" doesn't always mean that______.
A．something has become stronger and better
B．something has been changed from being one thing to another
C．something has become funny
D．something turns out to be worse than before
However, we Americans need to become more (4)_____ about the effects those pesticides on our food. More (5)_____, we need to think about what new (6)_____ is necessary to protect ourselves from a (7)_____ too rich in Pesticide residue. If we don't demand greater (8)_____ on pesticide use, we may be surprised, dismayed, and (9)_____ horrified by the consequence of its use.
On the most obvious level, farm workers who continue to use the pesticides (10)_____ their present rate will (11)_____ serious diseases. It's no (12)_____ that farmers (13)_____ to herbicides have a six times greater risk of getting cancer. (14)_____, children who live in homes where pesticides are used have an increased chance of getting childhood leukemia(白血病).
But the farmers are not the only ones (15)_____ risk. Consumers may also suffer serious side effects from daily (16)_____ of foods tainted(污染) by pesticides. Although scientists have yet to prove the link (17)_____, they are concerned that pesticide use may be one reason for the startling increase in various forms of cancer like breast and colon(结肠) cancers.
We need new legislation that (18)_____ stricter standards governing pesticide residues in food. Much of the current legislation is based on ignorance. Simply (19)_____, we allow high levels of carcinogens in our food because we don't know for sure that they do cause cancer in humans. Yet, why should we take the risk？ If there's a chance that a pesticide causes cancer, then it should be (20)_____ from use.
A．In spite of
B．Thanks to
C．Given
D．Provided
A.relay
B.rely
C.deny
D.delay
While nobody can deny the __22__ that some people seem to be blessed with particular creativity, research shows that anyone can __23__ their chances of coming up with new and original ideas __24__ they would only engage themselves more in the process of __25__. It&39; s the old Thomas Edison thing about "discovery__26__ 99 percent perspiration (汗水) and 1 percent inspiration. " __27__ , the studies prove this:great creative breakthroughs usually happen only __28__ intense periods of struggle. It is sustained effort towards a specific goal __29__ eventually prepares for great creative insights.
This kind of sustained effort does not always __30__ immediate results, a fact that not only separates the innovators (革新者) from non-innovators, but __31__leads some people to conclude that it is just not __32__ for them. "Maybe I should have gone to medical school like my mother wanted," they wonder when the breakthrough is __33__ to be found. Alas, one forgets during inevitable encounters __34__self-doubt,that the big surprise is never __35__. Indeed,it can happen at any time and place.
21______
A.to
B.in
C.at
D.by
22A.issue
B.problem
C.reason
D.fact
27A.Sooner or later
B.Some day or other
C.Every now and then
D.Time and again
28A.beyond
B.after
C.above
D.through
29A.that
B.who
C.what
D.as
30
A.create
B.produce
C.inspire
D.encourage
31A.too
B.once
C.again
D.also
33A.anywhere
B.everywhere
C.somewhere
D.nowhere
34A.against
B.across
C.with
D.into
35A.far away
B.used up
C.cleared off
D.near by
23A.miss
B.reduce
C.increase
D.lose
32A.good
B.difficult
C.possible
D.stupid
24A.because
B.if
C.while
D.whether
25A.creation
B.practice
C.production
D.achievement
26A.being
B.be
C.was
D.were
请帮忙给出每个问题的正确答案和分析，谢谢！
By 1950 it had been taught to one and a half million speakers, and it was spoken in six hundred schools. Today Esperanto is spoken by about eight million people, and more than one hundred newspapers and magazines in the language are published regularly throughout the world. Thousands of books have been written in Esperanto, including those translated from other languages.
Today the need for a new auxiliary language like Esperanto seems less obvious. Throughout this century English has grown more and more important. It has become a second language for many millions of people. The fact that more are learning English shows that the use of English is still growing worldwide. No one would deny the usefulness of world language, but not many people think that Esperanto is likely to play such a role.
Over the years, people have made up new languages in the hope that ______.
A.all people will be able to speak a common language
B.people will learn a foreign language better
C.people can understand each other better
D.people will be able to speak several languages
Zamenhof made the language as simple as possible because ______.A.he wanted people to learn it quickly
B.he hoped more and more people would be willing to learn it
C.he wanted everyone to speak it without any difficulty
D.he hoped it would be accepted as an official world language
Which of the following is NOT true of English？A.It is widely taught in schools.
B.It has become a second language for many millions of people.
C.Many books have been written in English.
D.It is less popular than Esperanto.
What is the best title of the passage？A.The language made by one man.
B.A talk about the world language.
C.English as a second language for everyone.
D.Esperanto—a better language than English.
请帮忙给出每个问题的正确答案和分析，谢谢！
Part C
Directions: Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written clearly on ANSWER SHEET II. (10 points)
Do animals have rights.'？ This is how the question is usually put. It sounds like a useful, ground clearing way to start. 46) Actually, it isn't, because it assumes that there is an agreed account of human rights, which is something the world does not have.
On one view of rights, to be sure, it necessarily follows that animals have none. 47) Some philosophers argue that rights exist only within a social contract, as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements. Therefore, animals cannot have rights. The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd, for exactly the same reason, so is the idea that tigers have rights. However, this is only one account, and by no means an uncontested one. It denies rights not only to animals but also to some people—4or instance to infants, the mentally incapable and future generations.
In addition, it is unclear what force a contract can have for people who never consented to it, how do you reply to somebody who says "I don' t like this contract" ？
The point is this: without agreement on the rights of people, arguing about the rights of animals is fruitless. 48 ) It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: it invites you to think that animals should be treated either with the consider- ation humans extend to other humans, or with no consideration at all. This is a false choice. Better to start with another, more fundamental, question: is the way we treat animals a moral issue at all？
Many deny it. 49) Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect, extremists of this kind think that animals lie outside the area of moral choice.
Any regard for the suffering of animals is seen as a mistake—a sentimental displacement of feeling that should properly be directed to other humans.
This view which holds that torturing a monkey is morally equivalent to chopping wood, may seem bravely "logical". In fact it is simply shallow: the confused center is right to reject it. The most elementary form. of moral reasoning—the ethical equivalent of learning to crawl—is to weigh others' interests against one's own. This in turn requires sympathy and imagination: without there is no capacity for moral thought. To see an animal in pain is enough, for most, to engage sympathy. 50)When that happens, it is not a mistake: it is mankind' s instinct for moral reasoning in action, an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.
46.____________________
Animal welfare groups are apparently most concerned with high school students experimenting with animals in extracurricular projects. Barbara Orlans, President of the Scientists' Center for Animal Welfare, said that students have been performing surgery at random, testing known poisonous substances, and running other pathology (病理学) experiments on animals without even knowing normal physiology (生理学).
At one science fair, a student cut off the leg and tail of a lizard (蜥蜴) to demonstrate that only the tail can regenerate, she said. In another case, a student bound sparrows, starved them and observed their behavior.
"The amount of abuse had been quite horrifying," Orlans said.
Administrators of major science fairs are short-tempered over the teachers' policy change and the impression it has created. "The teachers were sold a bill of goods by Barbara Orlans," said Thurman Grafton, who heads the rules committee for the International Science and Engineering Fair. "Backyard tabletop surgery is just nonsense. The new policies throw cold water on students inquisitiveness," he said. Grafton said he wouldn't deny that there hasn't been animal abuse among projects at the international fair, but he added that judges reject contestants who have unnecessarily injured animals. The judges have a hard time monitoring local and regional fairs that may or may not choose to comply with the international fair's rules that stress proper care of animals, Grafton said.
He said that several years ago, the Westinghouse Science Talent Search banned harmful experiments to animals when sponsors threatened to cancel their support after animal welfare groups lobbied for change.
The teachers adopted the new policies also to fend off proposed legislation — in states including Missouri and New York — that would restrict or prohibit experiments on animals.
Officials of the two teachers' organizations say that they don't know how many animals have been abused in the classroom. On the one hand, many biology teachers are not trained in the proper care of animals, said Wayne Moyer, executive director of the biology teachers' association. On the other hand, the use of animals in experiments has dropped in recent years because of school budget cuts. The association may set up seminars to teach better animal care to its members.
What is the passage mainly about？
A．Science teachers banning testing harmful to animals.
B．Teachers' policy change in experiment on animals.
C．The new policies of banning harmful experiments to animals.
D．The importance of prohibiting harmful experiments on animals.
